Mass Media Funk is a commentary on mass media stories about the scientific, the paranormal, the supernatural, and anything else that yanks at my eyebrows.
|
59 Wi-Fi and autism? November 25, 2007. Tamara J. Mariea and George L. Carlo claim to have found
In case that wasn't clear: Mariea and Carlo claim that Wi-Fi is a significant causal factor in the development of autism and it interferes with the treatment of autism. Carlo raised the alarm on cell phones causing brain tumors when he appeared on ABC's "20/20" in 1999.* He contradicted the conclusions of most other researchers in the field at the time and the consensus still is that cell phones are not causing brain tumors. His view on wi-fi and autism should be taken with a grain of salt until other, more reliable, researchers find evidence of such a connection. Also, it should be noted that Carlo and Mariea are part of a group that calls itself The Safe Wireless Initiative, a group dedicated to spreading the word about the dangers of EMR. We should be a bit skeptical of researchers who set out to prove a pet belief, rather than test a hypothesis. Carlo's article was published in the Journal of the Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine (ACNEM) [Vol. 26 No.2 (August 2007), pages 3-7]. The college is an independent, non-profit, post-graduate medical college devoted to the promotion and study of "nutritional and environmental medicine," which it defines as:
The QuackWatch folks might be a bit suspicious of this college since it advocates analyzing hair for minerals and heavy metals.*
Another reason to be cautious with Carlo's work is that he claims that
Since there is no general consensus regarding the cause or causes of autism, it is extremely unlikely that there is a general consensus on the treatment. Some think diet is important and the first line of treatment they recommend is to avoid certain kinds of foods. Others, like Carlo, believe heavy metals are important and they recommend chelation therapy. Most think the genetic component is most important. What might be true is that clinicians at the Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine believe that heavy metals are a significant causal factor in the development of autism and that heavy metal detoxification should be one of the first things tried in treatment. But it is false to claim that this treatment is emerging among clinicians as the first course of action. In fact, the idea that heavy metals are a significant causal factor in the development of autism is not the view of mainstream researchers in the field. It is the view of a number of parents of autistic children and is considered a fringe view by most in the field.* In fact, Dr. Roy E. Kerry is facing manslaughter charges for chelating a 5-year-old autistic boy who died after the treatment. Kerry is also being sued by the parents and faces disciplinary action from the Pennsylvania State Board of Medicine. Carlo's study is based on several questionable assumptions. One, Carlo assumes that heavy metal toxicity is involved in autism. Two, he assumes that heavy metal detoxification is the proper therapy for children with autism. Three, he assumes cell phones are significant causal factors in brain tumors, bird and bee colony collapses, and autism. This last assumption seems to be based on two things: a correlation between a perceived increased incidence of autism and use of wireless technology, and a belief that EMR prevents cells in the human body from getting rid of heavy metals. Carlo writes:
The general consensus, however, is that there has not been a dramatic increase in autism. If you look hard enough, you will find quite a few interesting correlations with the rise in the prevalence of autism (diagnosis and recognition), none of which would indicate a causal relationship. Also, I'd like to see the evidence that nearly half the people on the planet are using wireless communication devices. [The CIA. estimates there are over 2 billion cell phones out there; so, if you include garage door openers, you might well have in excess of 3 billion wireless devices in use at some time during each lovely day on our planet.] The main reason for not paying much attention to Mariea's and Carlo's study is that it is very poorly designed. It uses no controls and was not blinded. Also, their claim that Wi-Fi causes autism by trapping heavy metals in cells is in no way supported by their study, which allegedly measured the amount and speed of "heavy metal clearance" "in an EMR-free environment." The latter was defined as their building where there are no Wi-Fi devices and cell phones are not allowed. The authors write:
Or not. They have no controls, so we don't know what any of their data mean in general. Also, one might question their notion of an "EMR-free environment." I've been in buildings that don't have Wi-Fi but I was able to connect to wireless located in another building nearby. A company that wanted to install wi-fi on a water tower in my town claimed that their signal traveled for three miles. I assume that signal will go into your building regardless of whether you have a receiver. There may be no cell phones in your building but that does not seem make your building "EMR-free." If you have lights in your building, you do not have an EMR-free environment. Maybe they're in a Faraday cage. Maybe they work in the dark. For more on what people are saying about this study, see CrunchGear.com further reading Judelsohn, Richard G. (2007). "Vaccine Safety: Vaccines Are One of Public Health's Great Accomplishments." Skeptical Inquirer. November/December. Norman, Matthew and Jesse Dallery. (2007). "Mercury Rising: Exploring the Vaccine-Autism Myth." Skeptic. vol. 13 num 3. Novella, Steven. (2007). "The Anti-Vaccination Movement." Skeptical Inquirer. November/December. Radford, Benjamin. (2007). An Interview with Roy Richard Grinker. Skeptical Inquirer. Vol 31, issue 6, November/December. |
|
The Skeptic's Refuge