Robert Todd Carroll
|
|
psi-conducive stateA psi-conducive state is a state of consciousness that is believed to open the door to psi experiences. According to Daryl J. Bem and Charles Honorton, there is substantial evidence that the meditative state, the dream state, the hypnotic state, the sensory deprivation state, and certain drug-induced states are conducive to psi (1994). These psi-conducive states, they believe, have in common “reduced sensory input.” Dean Radin (1997) agrees and thinks that in such states the mind is alert and receptive to psi. Bem and Honorton write that “psi-mediated information is conceptualized as a weak signal that is normally masked by internal somatic and external sensory ‘noise.’ By reducing ordinary sensory input, these diverse psi-conducive states are presumed to raise the signal-to-noise ratio, thereby enhancing a person’s ability to detect the psi-mediated information.” In other words, ordinarily sense data block out psi data and by blocking out sense data we let in psi data. This an interesting claim coming only a few paragraphs after the authors claim that the term 'psi' does not connote "anything about ... underlying mechanisms." Parapsychologist Susan Blackmore claims that the psi-conducive claim has never been proven (2003, p. 298). Indeed, since we have no idea how psi works, the best that can be said is that there have been some telepathy experiments where senders or receivers have been in a state of reduced sensory input, such as the Maimonides dream telepathy experiments, which have shown some apparent success. However, that success has been met with some serious criticism (Hansel 1989; Hyman 1989; Marks 2000). It is possible that sensory deprived states are not psi-conducive states, but are high suggestibility or hallucination states. We know that sensory deprivation stimulates auditory and visual hallucinations. We know that hypnosis works especially well with suggestible and fantasy-prone imaginations. Perceptions under alleged psi-conducive conditions are better explained as being generated by the imagination or by the brain itself rather than by some external, psi-based, stimulus. On the contrary, say Bem and Honorton, who write:
This is not the place to try to refute all these claims, so I will limit
myself to a comment on the Maimonides dream telepathy experiments. These
experiments were done in such a way that ambiguous data could easily be
retrofitted to support the telepathy hypothesis. For example, in one
experiment the target was Max Beckman’s Descent from the Cross. ganzfeld and psi-conducive states The ganzfeld experiments were designed with the psi-conducive state in mind. While the ganzfeld experiments themselves do not allow for the kind of loose interpretation as to what counts as a "hit" that went on in the dream telepathy experiments, some ganzfeld researchers are quite impressed by similar ambiguities. For example, here is a transcript of a verbal description made by a receiver in an autoganzfeld experiment. It was taken from (a now defunct page from) Dr. Rick Berger's website on the ganzfeld. Berger developed the autoganzfeld.
There are quite a few images that would "match" this description, since the description itself contains at least eight distinct images (the Lincoln memorial, Lincoln, 4th of July, fireworks, Valley Forge, bombs, Francis Scott Key, Charleston) to which one could easily add a couple more, such as the American flag, the star spangled banner, and, oh yes, George Washington, which was the image selected as most closely resembling the verbal description. Berger thinks that these impressions may have been generated by the picture of George Washington that the sender was concentrating on. However, there might be a dozen other reasons why the receiver envisaged what he did. See also ganzfeld, psi assumption, and psi-focus assumption. further reading Blackmore, Susan. (2003). Consciousness: An Introduction (Oxford University Press. Frazier, Kendrick. editor, Science Confronts the Paranormal (Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1986). Hines, Terence. Pseudoscience and the Paranormal 2nd ed. (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 2003). Hyman, Ray. "Evaluation of Program on Anomalous Mental Phenomena," Journal of Scientific Exploration, Volume 10 Number 1. Marks, David. The Psychology of the Psychic (Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 2000). Randi, James. Flim-Flam! (Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books,1982).
|
|
|
©copyright 2006 Robert Todd Carroll |
Last updated 02/17/08 | ||